tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4215962051788443675.post6395727744159524282..comments2023-11-16T01:11:44.811-08:00Comments on IMistaken: Recent adventures with C++Lior Friedman:http://www.blogger.com/profile/09488722485273801828noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4215962051788443675.post-90706472832478396352011-02-08T06:29:27.482-08:002011-02-08T06:29:27.482-08:00Yes and you are right.
However the damage is alrea...Yes and you are right.<br />However the damage is already done. The cost of changing that seems to be much to big Vs just working on the same environment.<br /><br />In any case I really liked your post.<br />thought me something new, thank you.Lior Friedman:https://www.blogger.com/profile/09488722485273801828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4215962051788443675.post-91718055093326536332011-02-07T00:30:51.660-08:002011-02-07T00:30:51.660-08:00So the DLL used a std::string in its public interf...So the DLL used a std::string in its public interface?<br /><br />That's your problem, by doing that you're restricting the dll to use by callers who are using the same implementation of std::string AND are compiled exactly the same as your dll. <br /><br />See <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/blog/2005/06/working-on-the-borders.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lenholgate.com/blog/2005/06/working-on-the-borders.html</a> for more details.Len Holgatehttp://www.lenholgate.comnoreply@blogger.com